The Yale Center For Bioethics
So someone has been bugging me to update with a new post! I'm working on another post, but that won't be ready for awhile, but when it is...it will be a doozy. So to have a quick update on life, I thought I would talk about the new things happening in my life. The reason I have been too busy to update my blog is because I have started my internship at the Center for Bioethics at Yale. We are really hard at work right now with a publication called the Bioethics at Yale Journal, which is a a yearly publication about the work being done at the Center.
Other than that though, we've started our summer seminar series. Today we had Margaret Farley, who is Co-director of the Center and Dean of the Divinity School at Yale University, lead the class and discussion. Today was the first time I met all of the other interns, a lot of them are from Yale, one is from Princeton, another from University of Toronto, another from the University of Northern Texas, to name a few of the different institutions that the interns are from. With the nervousness of meeting new people, I have yet to really gauge my reaction to them because I haven't had the time or the nerve to go and talk to them all. But I am sure that I will end up liking all of them, if not also being good friends with them. Today's class, Dr. Farley gave the interns an overview of ethics, medical ethics, and bioethics and the different principles and discourses that guide them. She was an amazing speaker (everyone who has met her raves about her, including Carol Pollard, who is the Assistant Director of the Institute for Social and Policy Studies), and I learned quite a bit.
Now this is my third year doing the internship, and every year they have had this seminar, and the most interesting part about these seminars is when we look at case studies. For example, one of the cases we discussed today was about a committee for a hospital sees that 4 patients have been recommended by their physicians for long-term kidney dialysis. Unfortunately, there are only 2 spots available. The question posed to us was how is the committee supposed to determine which patients are to receive life-saving dialysis. What do you think?
There were two interns who suggested randomization; I was one of them. The reason I supported this view was while it seems arbitrary, to pick according to any other criteria would be morally arbitrary as well (to understand terminology, read Rawls), so the fairest and most equal way to do choose would be randomly. The other interns suggested possibility for success, age, medical utility (meaning how well the treatment would work); one even suggested the patient's benefit to society. I might have been surprised at the last option, because of the difficulty to gauge this quality. Overall though, it was a fruitful discussion, and I look forward to more of them. I am excited about this internship, as I was in the years before.
"Integrity is doing the right thing, even if nobody is watching."-- Anonymous






